Floot vs Lovable
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
Build and host full-stack apps from inside Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor
Build and host web apps and websites by chatting with an AI agent, with your code synced to Git.
- Free access
- Floot: Free access
- Lovable: Free access
- Paid from
- Floot: USD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly price
- Lovable: EUR 21 per month
- Plans listed
- Floot: 4
- Lovable: 4
- Public API
- Floot: Not confirmed
- Lovable: Not confirmed
Where Floot and Lovable differ
On the listed facts these two look alike. The plans, limits and screenshots below show where the details part ways.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| Floot | Fact | Lovable |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free access availableFree · USD 0 | Free accessSame | Free access availableFree · EUR 0 |
| USD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly pricePro · $250 | Lowest listed paid plan | EUR 21 per monthPro · billed yearly · EUR 25 billed monthly, incl. VAT |
| Free ($0, 100 build actions a day); paid plans from $25 a month | Pricing model | Free plan; paid Pro and Business |
| 4 | Plans listedSame | 4 |
| Not confirmed | Public API | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Card to start | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Open source | Not confirmed |
| What it is for | ||
| Non-coders who already pay for an AI assistant and want it to build and host an app with a database | Built for | AI-built web apps with synced code |
| Website builders | CategorySame | Website builders |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with |
|
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Oct 17, 2026 | Pricing checkSame | Prices confirmed · Sep 26, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
Floot
Prices confirmed · Oct 17, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- ProUSD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly priceUSD 250
- PowerUSD 100 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly priceUSD 1,000
- Credit top-upUSD 20 minimum; $1 = 1,000 credits
Lovable
Prices confirmed · Sep 26, 2026- FreeEUR 0
- ProEUR 21 per monthbilled yearly · EUR 25 billed monthly, incl. VAT
- BusinessEUR 42 per monthbilled yearly · EUR 50 billed monthly, incl. VAT
- EnterpriseContact provider
Strengths and limits
Floot
Strengths
- No token fees: The documentation says the thinking runs on your own assistant subscription, so Floot bills build actions rather than tokens.
- Backend included: The documentation lists a Postgres database, sign-in, storage, email and hosting provisioned with each project.
- Free start: The Free plan costs $0 with 100 build actions a day and a one-time $3 hosting allowance.
Limits to plan around
- Needs a separate AI subscription: Building depends on an assistant you already pay for, which is not part of Floot's price.
- Free tier cannot keep an app running: Free has no recurring hosting, scheduled jobs do not run, and the badge, custom domain and analytics dashboard need a paid plan.
- Unclear plan wording: The pricing FAQ still describes credit quotas and rollover while the plan table lists build actions, and older plans are limited to 100 actions a day over the connector.
Lovable
Strengths
- No per-seat pricing: Every plan allows unlimited workspace members, so adding collaborators changes how fast credits go, not the subscription price.
- Code stays yours: Git sync to GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket works on every plan, and Lovable states you own the apps, code and data you create.
- Transparent message costs: Plan mode is 1 credit per message and each Build mode reply shows exactly what it used.
Limits to plan around
- Small free allowance: Free grants 5 build credits a day but stops at 30 a month, with no custom domain and a read-only code editor.
- Costs are hard to predict upfront: Build mode charges on the work done, so a complex request can use far more than the published examples.
- One balance for building and running: Hosting, database and in-app AI usage beyond the grants draw on the same credits as development work.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.