Devin Desktop vs Gemma 4

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
Free access
Devin Desktop: Free access
Gemma 4: Free access
Paid from
Devin Desktop: USD 20 per month
Gemma 4: No fixed price listed
Plans listed
Devin Desktop: 5
Gemma 4: 1
Public API
Devin Desktop: Not confirmed
Gemma 4: Yes

Where Devin Desktop and Gemma 4 differ

  • PlansDevin Desktop lists 5 plans and Gemma 4 lists 1.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

Devin Desktop Fact Gemma 4
Access and price
Free access availableFree · USD 0Free accessSameFree access availableOpen weights (Apache 2.0) · 0
USD 20 per monthProLowest listed paid planNo fixed price listed
Free plan; Pro $20/monthPricing modelFree open weights (Apache 2.0); you supply the hardware
5Plans listedDiffers1
Not confirmedPublic APIYes
Not confirmedCard to startNot confirmed
Not confirmedOpen sourceYes
What it is for
Developers reviewing small repository changesBuilt forRunning an open model locally for code and text work
CodingCategorySameCoding
  • Desktop IDE
  • Local agent with optional cloud workflows
Platforms
  • Local on Linux, Windows or macOS (Ollama, llama.cpp, LM Studio)
  • Google AI Studio (26B A4B and 31B)
  • Gemini API (free tier)
  • Android and edge devices (E2B, E4B)
Not listedWorks with
  • Hugging Face Transformers
  • Kaggle
  • Ollama
  • llama.cpp
  • LM Studio
  • +4 more
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Oct 4, 2026Pricing checkSamePrices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

Devin Desktop

Prices confirmed · Oct 4, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0
  • ProUSD 20 per month
  • MaxUSD 200 per month
  • TeamsUSD 80 per month base plus $40 per month per full developer seat
  • EnterpriseCustom quote
Plan conditions and sources

Gemma 4

Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026
  • Open weights (Apache 2.0)0
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
Devin Desktop official pricing page screenshot with plan names
Devin DesktopOfficial pricing pagedevin.aiCaptured
Gemma 4 row on the official Gemini API pricing page showing free-tier and paid-tier availability
Gemma 4Official pricing pageai.google.devCaptured

Strengths and limits

Devin Desktop

Strengths

  • Local project context: An agent can work with actual project files and tools.
  • Migration continuity: Existing Windsurf configuration has a documented migration path.
  • Fine-grained permissions: Deny, ask and allow rules can be scoped to file reads, writes, commands, HTTP fetches and MCP tools.

Limits to plan around

  • Local execution has consequences: Commands operate in the developer environment within the configured permissions.
  • Legacy access needs checking: The migration FAQ and new-sale plan cards address different account situations.
  • Paid cost follows quotas: Plans differ by models and usage limits, and extra usage is separate from the subscription.

Gemma 4

Strengths

  • Permissive license: Apache 2.0 allows commercial use, modification and redistribution without a separate Gemma agreement.
  • Runs offline: Downloaded weights work without an account or network connection once installed.
  • Published memory table: Google lists approximate memory for every size at 16-bit, 8-bit and 4-bit precision.

Limits to plan around

  • Hardware is your cost: The 31B model needs 17.5 GB even at 4-bit, before context memory.
  • No paid hosted tier on the Gemini API: The pricing page lists only a free tier, and free-tier content is used to improve Google products.
  • Older training data: The pre-training data has a January 2025 cutoff, so later events need to be supplied in the prompt.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
Devin Desktop homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
Devin DesktopOfficial sitedevin.aiCaptured
Gemma 4 homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
Gemma 4Official sitedeepmind.googleCaptured
Product pages of both tools
Gemma 4 features page screenshot showing the product interface
Gemma 4Official sitedeepmind.googleCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.