Devin Desktop vs Gemma 4
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change toolsIDE with local agent execution
Open weights you run and license yourself
- Free access
- Devin Desktop: Free access
- Gemma 4: Free access
- Paid from
- Devin Desktop: USD 20 per month
- Gemma 4: No fixed price listed
- Plans listed
- Devin Desktop: 5
- Gemma 4: 1
- Public API
- Devin Desktop: Not confirmed
- Gemma 4: Yes
Where Devin Desktop and Gemma 4 differ
- PlansDevin Desktop lists 5 plans and Gemma 4 lists 1.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| Devin Desktop | Fact | Gemma 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free access availableFree · USD 0 | Free accessSame | Free access availableOpen weights (Apache 2.0) · 0 |
| USD 20 per monthPro | Lowest listed paid plan | No fixed price listed |
| Free plan; Pro $20/month | Pricing model | Free open weights (Apache 2.0); you supply the hardware |
| 5 | Plans listedDiffers | 1 |
| Not confirmed | Public API | Yes |
| Not confirmed | Card to start | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Open source | Yes |
| What it is for | ||
| Developers reviewing small repository changes | Built for | Running an open model locally for code and text work |
| Coding | CategorySame | Coding |
| Platforms |
|
| Not listed | Works with |
|
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Oct 4, 2026 | Pricing checkSame | Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
Devin Desktop
Prices confirmed · Oct 4, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- ProUSD 20 per month
- MaxUSD 200 per month
- TeamsUSD 80 per month base plus $40 per month per full developer seat
- EnterpriseCustom quote


Strengths and limits
Devin Desktop
Strengths
- Local project context: An agent can work with actual project files and tools.
- Migration continuity: Existing Windsurf configuration has a documented migration path.
- Fine-grained permissions: Deny, ask and allow rules can be scoped to file reads, writes, commands, HTTP fetches and MCP tools.
Limits to plan around
- Local execution has consequences: Commands operate in the developer environment within the configured permissions.
- Legacy access needs checking: The migration FAQ and new-sale plan cards address different account situations.
- Paid cost follows quotas: Plans differ by models and usage limits, and extra usage is separate from the subscription.
Gemma 4
Strengths
- Permissive license: Apache 2.0 allows commercial use, modification and redistribution without a separate Gemma agreement.
- Runs offline: Downloaded weights work without an account or network connection once installed.
- Published memory table: Google lists approximate memory for every size at 16-bit, 8-bit and 4-bit precision.
Limits to plan around
- Hardware is your cost: The 31B model needs 17.5 GB even at 4-bit, before context memory.
- No paid hosted tier on the Gemini API: The pricing page lists only a free tier, and free-tier content is used to improve Google products.
- Older training data: The pre-training data has a January 2025 cutoff, so later events need to be supplied in the prompt.
See both products



Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.
