Floot vs MagicPath

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
FlootWebsite builders

Build and host full-stack apps from inside Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor

Free access
Floot: Free access
MagicPath: Free access
Paid from
Floot: USD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly price
MagicPath: USD 10 per month
Plans listed
Floot: 4
MagicPath: 4
Public API
Floot: Not confirmed
MagicPath: Not confirmed

Where Floot and MagicPath differ

On the listed facts these two look alike. The plans, limits and screenshots below show where the details part ways.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

Floot Fact MagicPath
Access and price
Free access availableFree · USD 0Free accessSameFree access availableFree · USD 0
USD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly pricePro · $250Lowest listed paid planUSD 10 per monthBuilder · billed monthly · or $7 per month, $84 billed yearly
Free ($0, 100 build actions a day); paid plans from $25 a monthPricing modelFree 20 credits/day; Builder from $7/month billed yearly
4Plans listedSame4
Not confirmedPublic APINot confirmed
Not confirmedCard to startNot confirmed
Not confirmedOpen sourceNot confirmed
What it is for
Non-coders who already pay for an AI assistant and want it to build and host an app with a databaseBuilt forDesigning UI screens and prototypes with AI and coding agents
Website buildersCategorySameWebsite builders
  • Web
  • iOS
  • Android
Platforms
  • Web
  • macOS app
  • Chrome extension
  • MCP server for coding agents
  • Claude
  • ChatGPT
  • Cursor
  • Codex
  • MCP clients
  • +4 more
Works with
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Cursor
  • Claude app
  • Figma
  • +2 more
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Oct 17, 2026Pricing checkSamePrices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

Floot

Prices confirmed · Oct 17, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0
  • ProUSD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly priceUSD 250
  • PowerUSD 100 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly priceUSD 1,000
  • Credit top-upUSD 20 minimum; $1 = 1,000 credits
Plan conditions and sources

MagicPath

Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0
  • BuilderUSD 10 per monthbilled monthly · or $7 per month, $84 billed yearly
  • ProUSD 30 per monthbilled monthly, for 600 credits · or $21 per month, $252 billed yearly
  • TeamsCustom pricing
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
Floot official pricing page screenshot with plan names
FlootOfficial pricing pagefloot.comCaptured
MagicPath official pricing page screenshot with plan names
MagicPathOfficial pricing pagemagicpath.aiCaptured

Strengths and limits

Floot

Strengths

  • No token fees: The documentation says the thinking runs on your own assistant subscription, so Floot bills build actions rather than tokens.
  • Backend included: The documentation lists a Postgres database, sign-in, storage, email and hosting provisioned with each project.
  • Free start: The Free plan costs $0 with 100 build actions a day and a one-time $3 hosting allowance.

Limits to plan around

  • Needs a separate AI subscription: Building depends on an assistant you already pay for, which is not part of Floot's price.
  • Free tier cannot keep an app running: Free has no recurring hosting, scheduled jobs do not run, and the badge, custom domain and analytics dashboard need a paid plan.
  • Unclear plan wording: The pricing FAQ still describes credit quotas and rollover while the plan table lists build actions, and older plans are limited to 100 actions a day over the connector.

MagicPath

Strengths

  • Agent work does not use credits: Designs driven by Claude Code, Codex or Cursor are billed by that provider, not the MagicPath balance.
  • Linear pack pricing: Every Pro pack costs the same per credit, so moving up a pack does not change the unit price.
  • Code you can take away: Designs download as React code, and the FAQ says generated code may be used commercially.

Limits to plan around

  • Unpublished cost per design: Credits follow token usage with a minimum per generation, so a screen can cost more than expected.
  • No rollover and rigid downgrades: Credits reset each cycle; moving to monthly billing or a smaller pack requires cancelling first, and purchases are non-refundable.
  • Dated legal pages: The terms and privacy policy date from May 2025, before MagicPath 2.0, and the terms still describe a 7-day trial and monthly-only billing.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
Floot homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
FlootOfficial homepagefloot.comCaptured
MagicPath homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
MagicPathOfficial homepagemagicpath.aiCaptured
Product pages of both tools
MagicPath features page screenshot showing the product interface
MagicPathOfficial sitemagicpath.aiCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.