Floot vs Magic Patterns
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
Build and host full-stack apps from inside Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor
AI design tool that turns prompts and your design system into interactive React prototypes
- Free access
- Floot: Free access
- Magic Patterns: Free access
- Paid from
- Floot: USD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly price
- Magic Patterns: USD 0.02 per credit
- Plans listed
- Floot: 4
- Magic Patterns: 5
- Public API
- Floot: Not confirmed
- Magic Patterns: Yes
Where Floot and Magic Patterns differ
- PlansFloot lists 4 plans and Magic Patterns lists 5.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| Floot | Fact | Magic Patterns |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free access availableFree · USD 0 | Free accessSame | Free access availableFree · USD 0 |
| USD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly pricePro · $250 | Lowest listed paid plan | USD 0.02 per creditOn-demand usage |
| Free ($0, 100 build actions a day); paid plans from $25 a month | Pricing model | Free with limited monthly credits; Starter $20 and Business $100 per seat a month ($17 and $85 billed annually); extra credits $0.02; Enterprise custom |
| 4 | Plans listedDiffers | 5 |
| Not confirmed | Public API | Yes |
| Not confirmed | Card to start | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Open source | Not confirmed |
| What it is for | ||
| Non-coders who already pay for an AI assistant and want it to build and host an app with a database | Built for | Product teams that want clickable prototypes in their own design system, then a hand-off to code or Figma |
| Website builders | CategorySame | Website builders |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with |
|
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Oct 17, 2026 | Pricing checkSame | Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
Floot
Prices confirmed · Oct 17, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- ProUSD 25 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly priceUSD 250
- PowerUSD 100 per month; yearly billing is 10 times the monthly priceUSD 1,000
- Credit top-upUSD 20 minimum; $1 = 1,000 credits
Magic Patterns
Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- StarterUSD 20 per seat per month billed monthlyUSD 17 billed annually
- BusinessUSD 100 per seat per month billed monthlyUSD 85 billed annually
- EnterpriseCustom quote with annual commitment
- On-demand usageUSD 0.02 per credit
Strengths and limits
Floot
Strengths
- No token fees: The documentation says the thinking runs on your own assistant subscription, so Floot bills build actions rather than tokens.
- Backend included: The documentation lists a Postgres database, sign-in, storage, email and hosting provisioned with each project.
- Free start: The Free plan costs $0 with 100 build actions a day and a one-time $3 hosting allowance.
Limits to plan around
- Needs a separate AI subscription: Building depends on an assistant you already pay for, which is not part of Floot's price.
- Free tier cannot keep an app running: Free has no recurring hosting, scheduled jobs do not run, and the badge, custom domain and analytics dashboard need a paid plan.
- Unclear plan wording: The pricing FAQ still describes credit quotas and rollover while the plan table lists build actions, and older plans are limited to 100 actions a day over the connector.
Magic Patterns
Strengths
- Visible spend: Each reply reports its credit cost and model, and the docs publish typical credits for one generation up to a 50-version project.
- Free actions: Manual and visual edits, "Fix with AI", retries, exports and sharing use no credits.
- You own the output: The Terms assign designs, code and interfaces you generate to you; Magic Patterns claims no ownership.
Limits to plan around
- Free credits unquantified: The pricing page and docs say "free monthly credits" without a number, so the free allowance cannot be planned.
- Free work trains the service: The Terms let Magic Patterns train on Free plan inputs and output and show Free designs in public galleries.
- Key hand-off is paid: GitHub sync, MCP and design systems are marked as paid-plan features in the docs.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.