Semantic Scholar vs Consensus
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
Free academic search engine from Ai2 with AI summaries, citation signals, Research Feeds and an open API
Explore research papers with cited answers and study filters.
- Free access
- Semantic Scholar: Free access
- Consensus: Free access
- Paid from
- Semantic Scholar: No fixed price listed
- Consensus: USD 12 per month
- Plans listed
- Semantic Scholar: 3
- Consensus: 6
- Public API
- Semantic Scholar: Yes
- Consensus: Yes
Where Semantic Scholar and Consensus differ
- Pricing checkPrices confirmed for Semantic Scholar; pricing review due for Consensus.
- PlansSemantic Scholar lists 3 plans and Consensus lists 6.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| Semantic Scholar | Fact | Consensus |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free access availableWithout an account · USD 0 | Free accessSame | Free access availableFree |
| No fixed price listed | Lowest listed paid plan | USD 12 per monthPro (annual) · billed annually · USD 144 a year |
| Free; no paid plan; API keys free | Pricing model | Free plan; Pro from USD 12/month billed annually |
| 3 | Plans listedDiffers | 6 |
| Yes | Public APISame | Yes |
| Not required | Card to start | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Open source | No |
| What it is for | ||
| Searching and monitoring scientific literature for free, by hand or through an API | Built for | Finding and synthesizing published research |
| Research & sources | CategorySame | Research & sources |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with | Not listed |
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026 | Pricing checkDiffers | Pricing review due · Sep 24, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
Semantic Scholar
Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026- Without an accountUSD 0
- Free accountUSD 0
- API keyUSD 0
Consensus
Pricing review due · Sep 24, 2026- FreeFree
- Pro (annual)USD 12 per monthbilled annually · USD 144 a year
- Pro (monthly)USD 20 per monthbilled monthly
- Deep (annual)USD 45 per monthbilled annually · USD 540 a year
- Deep (monthly)USD 65 per monthbilled monthly
Show 1 more plan
- Team and EnterpriseContact sales
Strengths and limits
Semantic Scholar
Strengths
- Free without an account: Search, paper pages and citation data open without signing in.
- Published API limits: The API page states the shared rate for calls without a key and the starting rate for a key.
- Institutional full text: Signing in through OpenAthens, eduGAIN or InCommon links to subscribed PDFs through GetFTR and LibKey.
Limits to plan around
- TLDRs in two fields only: One-sentence AI summaries cover computer science and biomedical papers.
- Simple query language: Search has no Boolean operators or wildcards and does not expand abbreviations; quoted phrases work.
- Thin book and patent coverage: Book coverage is very limited and patents are excluded, so counts differ from other indexes.
Consensus
Strengths
- Large research index: Answers draw on a search of more than 220 million peer-reviewed papers, per the pricing page.
- Fine-grained study filters: Filters for study design, population, sample size and journal rank, plus a preprint switch, narrow results before you read.
- Reference-manager exports: Search results export to CSV, RIS or formatted bibliographies, and Deep reports export to PDF.
Limits to plan around
- Abstract-only evidence: When full text is unavailable, a cited paper may have been read from its abstract alone, so methods and caveats can be missing.
- Small Free allowance: Free has up to 3 Deep reviews monthly, each also consuming a Pro message. Official Pro-message allowances differ; confirm the available count in account settings.
- Team prices not listed: The Team and Enterprise tab of the pricing page shows no amounts; larger licenses are quoted by sales.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.