MuleRun vs Fathom
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
Watch the usage log, not the plan headline
Searchable meeting capture
- Free access
- MuleRun: Free access
- Fathom: Free access
- Paid from
- MuleRun: USD 20 per month
- Fathom: USD 19/user monthly; $15/user per month on annual billing
- Plans listed
- MuleRun: 5
- Fathom: 5
- Public API
- MuleRun: Not confirmed
- Fathom: Not confirmed
Where MuleRun and Fathom differ
On the listed facts these two look alike. The plans, limits and screenshots below show where the details part ways.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| MuleRun | Fact | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free access availableFree · USD 0 | Free accessSame | Free access availableFree · USD 0 |
| USD 20 per monthPlus · billed monthly · or $16 per month, $192 billed yearly | Lowest listed paid plan | USD 19/user monthly; $15/user per month on annual billingTeam |
| Free daily credits; paid from $16/month billed yearly | Pricing model | Free plan; Premium $20/user/month on monthly billing |
| 5 | Plans listedSame | 5 |
| Not confirmed | Public API | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Card to start | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Open source | Not confirmed |
| What it is for | ||
| Delegating multi-step research and file tasks to an AI agent | Built for | Meeting owners who verify commitments |
| Automation | CategorySame | Automation |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with | Not listed |
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026 | Pricing checkSame | Prices confirmed · Oct 5, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
MuleRun
Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- PlusUSD 20 per monthbilled monthly · or $16 per month, $192 billed yearly
- SuperUSD 40 per monthbilled monthly · or $32 per month, $384 billed yearly
- ProUSD 200 per monthbilled monthly · or $160 per month, $1,920 billed yearly
- Team and EnterpriseCustom pricing
Fathom
Prices confirmed · Oct 5, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- PremiumUSD 20/user monthly; $16/user per month on annual billing
- TeamUSD 19/user monthly; $15/user per month on annual billing
- BusinessUSD 34/user monthly; $25/user per month on annual billing
- EnterpriseCustom quote
Strengths and limits
MuleRun
Strengths
- Free credits without a card: Sign-up and daily credits let you try real tasks before paying.
- Failed requests are not billed: The credits FAQ says a failed request is not charged, and Settings > Usage explains each deduction.
- Always-on machine on paid plans: Scheduled and overnight work runs on a persistent cloud computer with daily backups.
Limits to plan around
- Unpredictable cost per task: Credits depend on steps and resources; background tasks or open sessions can keep consuming.
- Broad content license: The terms let the company use inputs and outputs for internal research, service improvement and brand promotion.
- Rigid billing changes: No self-service downgrade or monthly-yearly switch, upgrades do not refund the old plan, and fees are non-refundable.
Fathom
Strengths
- Return to the evidence: A recorded passage can help resolve an ambiguous summary.
- Start with an individual workflow: A team purchase is unnecessary just to evaluate basic capture.
- No storage ceiling on Free: Recordings, storage and transcription are unlimited, so archive size alone is no reason to upgrade.
Limits to plan around
- Recording is not agreement: An assigned action still needs the named participant to confirm it.
- Capture-mode restrictions: The advertised bot-free option is a Mac beta, not a promise across platforms.
- Summary depth drops on Free: After the monthly advanced-summary allowance, later calls fall back to the General/Enhanced template.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.