MuleRun vs Relevance AI
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
Watch the usage log, not the plan headline
No-code builder for AI agents and multi-agent workforces, billed in Actions per tool run plus pass-through model credits
- Free access
- MuleRun: Free access
- Relevance AI: No free tier
- Paid from
- MuleRun: USD 20 per month
- Relevance AI: USD 19 per month billed yearly
- Plans listed
- MuleRun: 5
- Relevance AI: 4
- Public API
- MuleRun: Not confirmed
- Relevance AI: Yes
Where MuleRun and Relevance AI differ
- AccessMuleRun offers free access, while Relevance AI has no free tier.
- PlansMuleRun lists 5 plans and Relevance AI lists 4.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| MuleRun | Fact | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free access availableFree · USD 0 | Free accessDiffers | No free tier |
| USD 20 per monthPlus · billed monthly · or $16 per month, $192 billed yearly | Lowest listed paid plan | USD 19 per month billed yearlyPro · $29/month billed monthly |
| Free daily credits; paid from $16/month billed yearly | Pricing model | No free plan; Pro $19/month billed yearly ($29 monthly), Team $234/month billed yearly ($349 monthly), Enterprise custom |
| 5 | Plans listedDiffers | 4 |
| Not confirmed | Public API | Yes |
| Not confirmed | Card to start | Required |
| Not confirmed | Open source | No |
| What it is for | ||
| Delegating multi-step research and file tasks to an AI agent | Built for | Sales, support and operations teams that want AI agents acting in their CRM and inbox with per-tool approvals |
| Automation | CategorySame | Automation |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with |
|
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026 | Pricing checkSame | Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
MuleRun
Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- PlusUSD 20 per monthbilled monthly · or $16 per month, $192 billed yearly
- SuperUSD 40 per monthbilled monthly · or $32 per month, $384 billed yearly
- ProUSD 200 per monthbilled monthly · or $160 per month, $1,920 billed yearly
- Team and EnterpriseCustom pricing
Relevance AI
Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026- ProUSD 19 per month billed yearlyUSD 29 per month billed monthly
- TeamUSD 234 per month billed yearlyUSD 349 per month billed monthly
- EnterpriseCustom quote
- Top-upsUSD 80 per 1,000 Actions; $20 per 10,000 Vendor Credits
Strengths and limits
MuleRun
Strengths
- Free credits without a card: Sign-up and daily credits let you try real tasks before paying.
- Failed requests are not billed: The credits FAQ says a failed request is not charged, and Settings > Usage explains each deduction.
- Always-on machine on paid plans: Scheduled and overnight work runs on a persistent cloud computer with daily backups.
Limits to plan around
- Unpredictable cost per task: Credits depend on steps and resources; background tasks or open sessions can keep consuming.
- Broad content license: The terms let the company use inputs and outputs for internal research, service improvement and brand promotion.
- Rigid billing changes: No self-service downgrade or monthly-yearly switch, upgrades do not refund the old plan, and fees are non-refundable.
Relevance AI
Strengths
- Model cost without markup: The docs say Vendor Credits pass LLM and tool costs through at wholesale, and your own API keys can replace them.
- Steps inside a tool are free: A multi-step tool run counts as one Action, so packing fixed steps into one tool keeps the Action count down.
- Approval per tool: Sensitive tools such as email or CRM writes can require approval while routine lookups run automatically.
Limits to plan around
- No free way in: The Free plan is retired for new signups and existing accounts, and the terms rule out change-of-mind refunds.
- Two official price views: The marketing pricing page lists only Enterprise, while the docs list Pro and Team with prices; plans are bought inside the app.
- Failures cost Actions: A tool run that fails still counts as one Action, so retries multiply the bill for a flaky integration.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.