NanoGPT vs Format Magic

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
NanoGPTWriting & content

Decide between list-price tokens and a weekly open-source allowance

Free access
NanoGPT: Free access
Format Magic: Free access
Paid from
NanoGPT: USD 12 per month
Format Magic: USD 9.95 per month
Plans listed
NanoGPT: 2
Format Magic: 4
Public API
NanoGPT: Not confirmed
Format Magic: Not confirmed

Where NanoGPT and Format Magic differ

  • PlansNanoGPT lists 2 plans and Format Magic lists 4.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

NanoGPT Fact Format Magic
Access and price
Free access availablePay as you go · USD 0 per monthFree accessSameFree access availableFree · USD 0 per month
USD 12 per monthProLowest listed paid planUSD 9.95 per monthBasic
Pay as you go from $0/month; Pro $12/monthPricing modelFree about 35 pages/month; paid from $9.95/month
2Plans listedDiffers4
Not confirmedPublic APINot confirmed
Not confirmedCard to startNot confirmed
Not confirmedOpen sourceNot confirmed
What it is for
Pay-per-use access to many AI models without separate subscriptionsBuilt forTurning plain or AI-drafted text into templated Word and PDF documents
Writing & contentCategorySameWriting & content
  • Web
  • API (OpenAI-compatible)
Platforms
  • Web
  • Claude and ChatGPT connector
  • OpenAI-compatible SDKs
  • MCP clients
  • Stripe (card payments)
  • Nano and other cryptocurrencies
Works with
  • Microsoft Word (.docx output)
  • PDF
  • Claude (connector)
  • ChatGPT (connector)
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026Pricing checkSamePrices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

NanoGPT

Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026
  • Pay as you goUSD 0 per monthprepaid balance · deposits from $1 by card or $0.10 in crypto
  • ProUSD 12 per month
Plan conditions and sources

Format Magic

Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0 per monthno credit card
  • BasicUSD 9.95 per month
  • ProUSD 14.95 per month
  • PremiumUSD 19.95 per month
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
NanoGPT official pricing page screenshot with plan names
NanoGPTOfficial pricing pagenano-gpt.comCaptured
Format Magic official pricing page screenshot with plan names
Format MagicOfficial pricing pageformatmagic.aiCaptured

Strengths and limits

NanoGPT

Strengths

  • No markup on list prices: The pricing page says text models cost the same per million tokens as at the provider.
  • No monthly commitment: Pay as you go has no fee and deposits start at $1 by card.
  • Local chat history by default: Web conversations stay on the device unless sync or sharing is switched on.

Limits to plan around

  • Pro excludes the big commercial models: The $12 plan covers open-source models; GPT, Claude and Gemini are billed from the balance.
  • Pro is personal only: The terms bar commercial use, resale and shared accounts on subscriptions.
  • Retention depends on the route: Final logging depends on the selected provider, and stored file copies have no single maximum retention period.

Format Magic

Strengths

  • Free plan without a card: About 35 pages a month can be formatted after a free sign-up.
  • Short retention for one-off jobs: The privacy policy says unsaved input and output are deleted within 12 hours.
  • Commercial use of your documents: The terms allow personal and business use of documents you create.

Limits to plan around

  • Character limits, not pages: Allowances are counted in characters, so page estimates vary with tables and images.
  • Text goes to third-party AI: Content is processed by providers such as Google Gemini and OpenAI.
  • Branding needs higher tiers: Template customization starts on Pro, and your own Word templates need Premium.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
NanoGPT homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
NanoGPTOfficial sitenano-gpt.comCaptured
Format Magic homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
Format MagicOfficial homepageformatmagic.aiCaptured
Product pages of both tools
NanoGPT features page screenshot showing the product interface
NanoGPTOfficial sitenano-gpt.comCaptured
Format Magic features page screenshot showing the product interface
Format MagicOfficial siteformatmagic.aiCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.