TRAE vs Kiro

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
KiroCoding

AWS agentic IDE and CLI built around specs, steering files and hooks, metered in monthly credits

Free access
TRAE: Free access
Kiro: Free access
Paid from
TRAE: USD 3 per month in the US
Kiro: USD 20 per user per month
Plans listed
TRAE: 5
Kiro: 6
Public API
TRAE: Not confirmed
Kiro: Not confirmed

Where TRAE and Kiro differ

  • PlansTRAE lists 5 plans and Kiro lists 6.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

TRAE Fact Kiro
Access and price
Free access availableFree · USD 0 outside the USFree accessSameFree access availableFree · USD 0
USD 3 per month in the USLite · $2.25 a month billed yearly; $8 per month in 12 listed countriesLowest listed paid planUSD 20 per user per monthPro
Free plan; Pro $20/month ($10 in the US)Pricing modelFree (50 credits/month); Pro $20, Pro+ $40, Pro Max $100, Power $200 per user per month; add-on credits $0.04
5Plans listedDiffers6
Not confirmedPublic APINot confirmed
Not confirmedCard to startNot confirmed
NoOpen sourceSameNo
What it is for
Agentic coding in a desktop IDE on a metered budgetBuilt forDevelopers who want spec-driven agent work in a VS Code-style IDE with a fixed monthly credit cap
CodingCategorySameCoding
  • Desktop app (macOS 12+ on Apple Silicon, Windows 10 and 11, Linux .deb and .rpm)
  • VS Code and JetBrains plugin
  • TraeWork (web, desktop and mobile)
Platforms
  • Desktop IDE (macOS, Windows, Linux)
  • CLI (macOS, Windows 11, Linux)
  • Web (paid plans)
  • iOS (TestFlight early access)
  • ACP-compatible editors
  • Visual Studio Code
  • JetBrains IDEs
  • MCP servers
Works with
  • GitHub
  • MCP servers
  • Open VSX extensions
  • AWS IAM Identity Center
  • AWS Builder ID
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Oct 2, 2026Pricing checkSamePrices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

TRAE

Prices confirmed · Oct 2, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0 outside the US
  • LiteUSD 3 per month in the USUSD 2.25 a month billed yearly; $8 per month in 12 listed countries
  • ProUSD 20 per month outside the USUSD 200 billed yearly; $10 per month in the US · $7.50 a month billed yearly
  • Pro+USD 60 per month outside the USUSD 600 billed yearly; $30 per month in the US · $22.50 a month billed yearly
  • UltraUSD 200 per month outside the USUSD 2,000 billed yearly; $100 per month in the US · $75 a month billed yearly
Plan conditions and sources

Kiro

Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0
  • ProUSD 20 per user per month
  • Pro+USD 40 per user per month
  • Pro MaxUSD 100 per user per month
  • PowerUSD 200 per user per month
Show 1 more plan
  • EnterpriseContact sales
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
TRAE official pricing page screenshot with plan names
TRAEOfficial pricing pagetrae.aiCaptured
Kiro pricing page with five plan cards from Kiro Free at $0 to Kiro Power at $200 per user per month and their monthly credits
KiroOfficial pricing pagekiro.devCaptured

Strengths and limits

TRAE

Strengths

  • A free way to start: Outside the US, Free includes Auto mode, a limited allowance and 5,000 autocompletions a month; first-time US subscribers get a one-time 7-day Pro trial.
  • Itemized usage records: The Usage page lists each charge with the model, time and amount deducted.
  • Prorated refund on upgrades: Moving to a higher tier refunds the unused share of the old plan automatically.

Limits to plan around

  • A budget, not unlimited use: Paid plans include a fixed dollar allowance; heavy agent work needs a higher tier or pay-as-you-go.
  • Chats may train models by default: Chat content, code snippets and outputs can be used for training unless Privacy mode is on while signed in.
  • Plans and prices differ by region: Subscriptions are sold only in listed countries, Lite in fewer still, and US visitors see a separate price list without a Free card.

Kiro

Strengths

  • Published credit sizes: Each plan states its monthly credits, and the docs list a multiplier for every model, so a month can be sized before paying.
  • Hard cap by default: If you buy no add-on credits, usage pauses at the plan limit instead of running up an overage bill.
  • Structured planning files: Specs leave requirements, design and tasks as files in the repository that you can review and keep.

Limits to plan around

  • Content used by default: Free and individual paid users' prompts, code and responses may be used for service improvement unless they opt out.
  • Free has no top-up: Free cannot buy add-on credits; when its 50 credits run out, you wait for next month or upgrade.
  • Credits do not roll over: Unused plan credits reset at the start of each calendar month; only purchased add-ons last 12 months.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
TRAE homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
TRAEOfficial homepagetrae.aiCaptured
Kiro homepage with the headline Move beyond AI coding to agentic engineering and download buttons for Crew, IDE and CLI
KiroOfficial homepagekiro.devCaptured
Product pages of both tools
TRAE features page screenshot showing the product interface
TRAEOfficial sitetrae.aiCaptured
Kiro IDE page with the headline The IDE for structured agentic development and an editor preview showing spec files
KiroOfficial sitekiro.devCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.