Fathom vs Lindy

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
Free access
Fathom: Free access
Lindy: Free trial only
Paid from
Fathom: USD 19/user monthly; $15/user per month on annual billing
Lindy: USD 29.99 per user per month
Plans listed
Fathom: 5
Lindy: 4
Public API
Fathom: Not confirmed
Lindy: Not confirmed

Where Fathom and Lindy differ

  • AccessFathom offers free access, while Lindy offers a free trial only.
  • PlansFathom lists 5 plans and Lindy lists 4.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

Fathom Fact Lindy
Access and price
Free access availableFree · USD 0Free accessDiffersFree trial only
USD 19/user monthly; $15/user per month on annual billingTeamLowest listed paid planUSD 29.99 per user per monthPlus
Free plan; Premium $20/user/month on monthly billingPricing modelFrom USD 29.99 per user per month; limited new-Slack-teammate trial
5Plans listedDiffers4
Not confirmedPublic APINot confirmed
Not confirmedCard to startRequired
Not confirmedOpen sourceNo
What it is for
Meeting owners who verify commitmentsBuilt forTeams drafting work from shared context
AutomationCategorySameAutomation
  • Web app
Platforms
  • Web
Not listedWorks with
  • Slack
  • Gmail
  • Google Drive
  • Notion
  • HubSpot
  • +2 more
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Oct 5, 2026Pricing checkSamePrices confirmed · Oct 1, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

Fathom

Prices confirmed · Oct 5, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0
  • PremiumUSD 20/user monthly; $16/user per month on annual billing
  • TeamUSD 19/user monthly; $15/user per month on annual billing
  • BusinessUSD 34/user monthly; $25/user per month on annual billing
  • EnterpriseCustom quote
Plan conditions and sources

Lindy

Prices confirmed · Oct 1, 2026
  • PlusUSD 29.99 per user per month
  • ProUSD 99.99 per user per month
  • MaxUSD 199.99 per user per month
  • EnterpriseCustom quote
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
Fathom official pricing page screenshot with plan names
FathomOfficial pricing pagefathom.aiCaptured
Lindy pricing page showing plan allocations; confirm checkout and trial terms
LindyOfficial pricing pagelindy.aiCaptured

Strengths and limits

Fathom

Strengths

  • Return to the evidence: A recorded passage can help resolve an ambiguous summary.
  • Start with an individual workflow: A team purchase is unnecessary just to evaluate basic capture.
  • No storage ceiling on Free: Recordings, storage and transcription are unlimited, so archive size alone is no reason to upgrade.

Limits to plan around

  • Recording is not agreement: An assigned action still needs the named participant to confirm it.
  • Capture-mode restrictions: The advertised bot-free option is a Mac beta, not a promise across platforms.
  • Summary depth drops on Free: After the monthly advanced-summary allowance, later calls fall back to the General/Enhanced template.

Lindy

Strengths

  • Shared allocation: Seat allowances contribute to a pool that the workspace can distribute.
  • Visible revisions: Files can be inspected and earlier saved versions restored.
  • Approval choice in shared threads: Integration settings let a team gate writes in the documented Slack context.

Limits to plan around

  • Seats can trigger billing: Direct signups and returning teammates are outside the new-Slack-user trial rule.
  • Channel-specific guardrails: Do not carry a shared-thread approval assumption into private chat.
  • Computer-use plan conflict: The public pricing wording and detailed Plus feature table need confirmation before a browser-control task.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
Fathom homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
FathomOfficial homepagefathom.aiCaptured
Lindy official product page; provider examples, not our generated output
LindyOfficial homepagelindy.aiCaptured
Product pages of both tools
Provider documentation example of Lindy Files with Personal and Workspace scopes
LindyOfficial sitedocs.lindy.aiCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.