Relevance AI vs Make
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
No-code builder for AI agents and multi-agent workforces, billed in Actions per tool run plus pass-through model credits
Connect app modules in visual automation scenarios.
- Free access
- Relevance AI: No free tier
- Make: Free access
- Paid from
- Relevance AI: USD 19 per month billed yearly
- Make: No fixed price listed
- Plans listed
- Relevance AI: 4
- Make: 3
- Public API
- Relevance AI: Yes
- Make: Yes
Where Relevance AI and Make differ
- AccessRelevance AI has no free tier, while Make offers free access.
- CardRelevance AI needs a card to start; Make does not.
- Pricing checkPrices confirmed for Relevance AI; pricing review due for Make.
- PlansRelevance AI lists 4 plans and Make lists 3.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| Relevance AI | Fact | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| No free tier | Free accessDiffers | Free access availableFree · USD 0 |
| USD 19 per month billed yearlyPro · $29/month billed monthly | Lowest listed paid plan | No fixed price listed |
| No free plan; Pro $19/month billed yearly ($29 monthly), Team $234/month billed yearly ($349 monthly), Enterprise custom | Pricing model | Free + paid; quote varies |
| 4 | Plans listedDiffers | 3 |
| Yes | Public APISame | Yes |
| Required | Card to startDiffers | Not required |
| No | Open sourceSame | No |
| What it is for | ||
| Sales, support and operations teams that want AI agents acting in their CRM and inbox with per-tool approvals | Built for | Visual automation for app workflows |
| Automation | CategorySame | Automation |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with | Not listed |
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026 | Pricing checkDiffers | Pricing review due · Sep 25, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
Relevance AI
Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026- ProUSD 19 per month billed yearlyUSD 29 per month billed monthly
- TeamUSD 234 per month billed yearlyUSD 349 per month billed monthly
- EnterpriseCustom quote
- Top-upsUSD 80 per 1,000 Actions; $20 per 10,000 Vendor Credits
Make
Pricing review due · Sep 25, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- Paid automationConfirm current quote
- EnterpriseCustom pricing
Strengths and limits
Relevance AI
Strengths
- Model cost without markup: The docs say Vendor Credits pass LLM and tool costs through at wholesale, and your own API keys can replace them.
- Steps inside a tool are free: A multi-step tool run counts as one Action, so packing fixed steps into one tool keeps the Action count down.
- Approval per tool: Sensitive tools such as email or CRM writes can require approval while routine lookups run automatically.
Limits to plan around
- No free way in: The Free plan is retired for new signups and existing accounts, and the terms rule out change-of-mind refunds.
- Two official price views: The marketing pricing page lists only Enterprise, while the docs list Pro and Team with prices; plans are bought inside the app.
- Failures cost Actions: A tool run that fails still counts as one Action, so retries multiply the bill for a flaky integration.
Make
Strengths
- Visual scenario builder: Routers, filters and fallback routes are drawn as a diagram, so the path each record takes is visible before anything runs.
- Free plan with no time limit: Free does not expire, so a small scenario can keep running without a subscription as long as it stays within the Free limits.
- Countable billing unit: An ordinary non-AI module run normally uses one credit, so cost can be estimated by counting modules and bundles.
Limits to plan around
- Free scheduling floor: On Free, scheduled scenarios run at most every 15 minutes and only two scenarios can be active at once.
- Empty checks still count: A scheduled trigger uses an operation each time it looks for data, even when it finds nothing; budget for checks as well as records.
- Separate AI-provider charges: With an eligible custom AI-provider connection, the provider bills its tokens on top of the operation credits Make charges.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.