Relevance AI vs Activepieces

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
Relevance AIAutomation

No-code builder for AI agents and multi-agent workforces, billed in Actions per tool run plus pass-through model credits

ActivepiecesAutomation

Open source workflow automation with AI agents, priced per run in credits, on its cloud or your own servers

Free access
Relevance AI: No free tier
Activepieces: Free access
Paid from
Relevance AI: USD 19 per month billed yearly
Activepieces: USD 20 per month
Plans listed
Relevance AI: 4
Activepieces: 6
Public API
Relevance AI: Yes
Activepieces: Yes

Where Relevance AI and Activepieces differ

  • AccessRelevance AI has no free tier, while Activepieces offers free access.
  • Open sourceOnly Activepieces is open source.
  • CardRelevance AI needs a card to start; Activepieces does not.
  • PlansRelevance AI lists 4 plans and Activepieces lists 6.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

Relevance AI Fact Activepieces
Access and price
No free tierFree accessDiffersFree access availableFree · USD 0
USD 19 per month billed yearlyPro · $29/month billed monthlyLowest listed paid planUSD 20 per monthPlus · $16/month billed yearly
No free plan; Pro $19/month billed yearly ($29 monthly), Team $234/month billed yearly ($349 monthly), Enterprise customPricing modelFree cloud plan (1,000 credits/month); Plus $20/month, Team $200/month; Ultimate and Embed custom; Community Edition self-hosts free
4Plans listedDiffers6
YesPublic APISameYes
RequiredCard to startDiffersNot required
NoOpen sourceDiffersYes
What it is for
Sales, support and operations teams that want AI agents acting in their CRM and inbox with per-tool approvalsBuilt forTeams that want Zapier-style flows and AI agents with the option to self-host the open source core
AutomationCategorySameAutomation
  • Web app
  • Relevance Chat (desktop, mobile and browser)
  • API and Python/JavaScript SDK
Platforms
  • Web (Activepieces Cloud, EU region in Frankfurt)
  • Self-hosted (Docker Compose, Kubernetes Helm chart)
  • Single-container hobbyist install
  • MCP server for Claude, Cursor and other MCP clients
  • HubSpot
  • Salesforce
  • Gmail
  • Slack
  • Google Drive
  • +11 more
Works with
  • Slack
  • Gmail
  • Google Sheets
  • Notion
  • HubSpot
  • +9 more
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026Pricing checkSamePrices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

Relevance AI

Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026
  • ProUSD 19 per month billed yearlyUSD 29 per month billed monthly
  • TeamUSD 234 per month billed yearlyUSD 349 per month billed monthly
  • EnterpriseCustom quote
  • Top-upsUSD 80 per 1,000 Actions; $20 per 10,000 Vendor Credits
Plan conditions and sources

Activepieces

Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0
  • PlusUSD 20 per monthUSD 16 per month billed yearly
  • TeamUSD 200 per monthUSD 166 per month billed yearly
  • UltimateCustom quote
  • EmbedFrom USD 36k a year
Show 1 more plan
  • Community Edition (self-hosted)FreeMIT licence
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
Relevance AI docs pricing page with Pro, Team and Enterprise cards and a notice that the Free plan is retired
Relevance AIOfficial pricing pagerelevanceai.comCaptured
Activepieces pricing page with four plan cards: Free at $0, Plus at $20, Team at $200 and Ultimate at a custom price
ActivepiecesOfficial pricing pageactivepieces.comCaptured

Strengths and limits

Relevance AI

Strengths

  • Model cost without markup: The docs say Vendor Credits pass LLM and tool costs through at wholesale, and your own API keys can replace them.
  • Steps inside a tool are free: A multi-step tool run counts as one Action, so packing fixed steps into one tool keeps the Action count down.
  • Approval per tool: Sensitive tools such as email or CRM writes can require approval while routine lookups run automatically.

Limits to plan around

  • No free way in: The Free plan is retired for new signups and existing accounts, and the terms rule out change-of-mind refunds.
  • Two official price views: The marketing pricing page lists only Enterprise, while the docs list Pro and Team with prices; plans are bought inside the app.
  • Failures cost Actions: A tool run that fails still counts as one Action, so retries multiply the bill for a flaky integration.

Activepieces

Strengths

  • Steps are not metered: A run costs one credit whether it has two steps or twenty, so long non-AI flows do not multiply the bill.
  • Open source core: The repository is MIT-licensed outside its enterprise directories, so the core can be read, forked and run on your own hardware.
  • Self-hosting on every plan: The pricing table lists cloud or on-prem hosting for Free, Plus, Team and Ultimate, and paid plans apply in-app without a license key.

Limits to plan around

  • Free reset is inconsistent: The pricing table says Free credits reset daily and runs over quota wait for tomorrow, while the FAQ says 1,000 credits a month and to wait until next month.
  • Short cloud run limits: On Activepieces Cloud a flow run times out after 10 minutes of active time, a worker gets 1 GB of memory and run data is deleted after 30 days.
  • No SOC 2 report yet: The pricing FAQ says the SOC 2 programme is in progress; a penetration test summary, DPA and sub-processor list are available on request.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
Relevance AI homepage with the headline Meet Invent 2.0 and a row of customer logos
Relevance AIOfficial homepagerelevanceai.comCaptured
Activepieces homepage with the headline AI Agents with enterprise control and a preview of the Agents list
ActivepiecesOfficial homepageactivepieces.comCaptured
Product pages of both tools
Relevance AI documentation introduction page describing a low-code platform for AI agents and workforces
Relevance AIOfficial siterelevanceai.comCaptured
Activepieces integrations page with the headline Automate the apps you already use and app icons around it
ActivepiecesOfficial siteactivepieces.comCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.