Kilo Code vs TRAE

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
Kilo CodeCoding

Open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains, the terminal and the cloud, with free models, your own keys or pay-as-you-go credits

Free access
Kilo Code: Free access
TRAE: Free access
Paid from
Kilo Code: USD 0.33 to $1.20 per hour
TRAE: USD 3 per month in the US
Plans listed
Kilo Code: 9
TRAE: 5
Public API
Kilo Code: Not confirmed
TRAE: Not confirmed

Where Kilo Code and TRAE differ

  • Pricing checkPrices confirmed for Kilo Code; pricing review due for TRAE.
  • PlansKilo Code lists 9 plans and TRAE lists 5.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

Kilo Code Fact TRAE
Access and price
Free access availableFree and open source · USD 0Free accessSameFree access availableFree · USD 0 outside the US
USD 0.33 to $1.20 per hourCloud compute · billed per secondLowest listed paid planUSD 3 per month in the USLite · $2.25 a month billed yearly; $8 per month in 12 listed countries
Free open-source agent; models paid separately (free, own keys or credits); Kilo Pass from $19/month; Teams $15/user/monthPricing modelFree plan; Pro $20/month ($10 in the US)
9Plans listedDiffers5
Not confirmedPublic APINot confirmed
Not confirmedCard to startNot confirmed
Not confirmedOpen sourceNo
What it is for
Developers who want one open-source coding agent across editor, terminal and cloud, and are comfortable managing model spend separately from the toolBuilt forAgentic coding in a desktop IDE on a metered budget
CodingCategorySameCoding
  • VS Code extension (also other VS Code-based editors)
  • JetBrains plugin
  • CLI
  • Desktop app (beta; macOS, Windows, Linux)
  • Web (Cloud Agents)
  • +2 more
Platforms
  • Desktop app (macOS 12+ on Apple Silicon, Windows 10 and 11, Linux .deb and .rpm)
  • VS Code and JetBrains plugin
  • TraeWork (web, desktop and mobile)
  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • Google
  • xAI
  • DeepSeek
  • +7 more
Works with
  • Visual Studio Code
  • JetBrains IDEs
  • MCP servers
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Nov 5, 2026Pricing checkDiffersPricing review due · Oct 2, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

Kilo Code

Prices confirmed · Nov 5, 2026
  • Free and open sourceUSD 0
  • Auto Free, BYOK or localUSD 0 a month
  • Kilo GatewayUSD 0 a month plus usage
  • Kilo Pass StarterUSD 19 per month
  • Kilo Pass ProUSD 49 per month
Show 4 more plans
  • Kilo Pass ExpertUSD 199 per month
  • TeamsUSD 15 per user per month
  • EnterpriseCustom
  • Cloud computeUSD 0.33 to $1.20 per hourbilled per second
Plan conditions and sources

TRAE

Pricing review due · Oct 2, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0 outside the US
  • LiteUSD 3 per month in the USUSD 2.25 a month billed yearly; $8 per month in 12 listed countries
  • ProUSD 20 per month outside the USUSD 200 billed yearly; $10 per month in the US · $7.50 a month billed yearly
  • Pro+USD 60 per month outside the USUSD 600 billed yearly; $30 per month in the US · $22.50 a month billed yearly
  • UltraUSD 200 per month outside the USUSD 2,000 billed yearly; $100 per month in the US · $75 a month billed yearly
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
Kilo Code official pricing page screenshot with plan names
Kilo CodeOfficial pricing pagekilo.aiCaptured
TRAE official pricing page screenshot with plan names
TRAEOfficial pricing pagetrae.aiCaptured

Strengths and limits

Kilo Code

Strengths

  • Free open-source clients: The VS Code extension, JetBrains plugin and CLI are MIT-licensed and free to install, with no mandatory subscription for individuals.
  • Many ways to pay for models: Free models, local models, your own provider keys or Gateway credits at provider rates, so you can avoid Kilo inference spend entirely.
  • Several surfaces, one agent: The same agent is offered in VS Code, JetBrains, the terminal, the cloud and Slack, and cloud sessions can be resumed locally per the FAQ.

Limits to plan around

  • Total cost is not one number: Platform, model inference, a 5% processing fee on top-ups and cloud compute are billed as separate parts, so a monthly bill has to be assembled.
  • Cloud compute is extra even with your own keys: The pricing FAQ says bringing your own keys covers model inference, not the container that runs a cloud agent.
  • Paid credits expire: Paid credits, including automatic top-ups, expire one calendar year after purchase; the 5% processing fee is non-refundable.

TRAE

Strengths

  • A free way to start: Outside the US, Free includes Auto mode, a limited allowance and 5,000 autocompletions a month; first-time US subscribers get a one-time 7-day Pro trial.
  • Itemized usage records: The Usage page lists each charge with the model, time and amount deducted.
  • Prorated refund on upgrades: Moving to a higher tier refunds the unused share of the old plan automatically.

Limits to plan around

  • A budget, not unlimited use: Paid plans include a fixed dollar allowance; heavy agent work needs a higher tier or pay-as-you-go.
  • Chats may train models by default: Chat content, code snippets and outputs can be used for training unless Privacy mode is on while signed in.
  • Plans and prices differ by region: Subscriptions are sold only in listed countries, Lite in fewer still, and US visitors see a separate price list without a Free card.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
Kilo Code homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
Kilo CodeOfficial homepagekilo.aiCaptured
TRAE homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
TRAEOfficial homepagetrae.aiCaptured
Product pages of both tools
TRAE features page screenshot showing the product interface
TRAEOfficial sitetrae.aiCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.