Kilo Code vs Warp

Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.

Change tools
Kilo CodeCoding

Open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains, the terminal and the cloud, with free models, your own keys or pay-as-you-go credits

WarpCoding

Terminal with a built-in coding agent, an agent CLI for other terminals, and cloud agents billed in dollars of usage

Free access
Kilo Code: Free access
Warp: Free access
Paid from
Kilo Code: USD 0.33 to $1.20 per hour
Warp: USD 20 per month
Plans listed
Kilo Code: 9
Warp: 5
Public API
Kilo Code: Not confirmed
Warp: Yes

Where Kilo Code and Warp differ

  • PlansKilo Code lists 9 plans and Warp lists 5.

Head to head

Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages

Kilo Code Fact Warp
Access and price
Free access availableFree and open source · USD 0Free accessSameFree access availableFree · USD 0
USD 0.33 to $1.20 per hourCloud compute · billed per secondLowest listed paid planUSD 20 per monthBuild · or $18/month billed annually
Free open-source agent; models paid separately (free, own keys or credits); Kilo Pass from $19/month; Teams $15/user/monthPricing modelFree $0 (pay-as-you-go agent usage or own API key); Build $20/month; Max $200/month; Business $50/user/month; Enterprise custom
9Plans listedDiffers5
Not confirmedPublic APIYes
Not confirmedCard to startNot confirmed
Not confirmedOpen sourceYes
What it is for
Developers who want one open-source coding agent across editor, terminal and cloud, and are comfortable managing model spend separately from the toolBuilt forDevelopers who work in the terminal and want an agent there, paid per use or through their own API key
CodingCategorySameCoding
  • VS Code extension (also other VS Code-based editors)
  • JetBrains plugin
  • CLI
  • Desktop app (beta; macOS, Windows, Linux)
  • Web (Cloud Agents)
  • +2 more
Platforms
  • macOS
  • Windows
  • Linux
  • Warp Agent CLI (any terminal, including over SSH)
  • Cloud agents
  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • Google
  • xAI
  • DeepSeek
  • +7 more
Works with
  • Slack
  • Linear
  • GitHub
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic
  • +3 more
How current
Profile sources checked
Prices confirmed · Nov 5, 2026Pricing checkSamePrices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026

Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.

Plans and prices

Kilo Code

Prices confirmed · Nov 5, 2026
  • Free and open sourceUSD 0
  • Auto Free, BYOK or localUSD 0 a month
  • Kilo GatewayUSD 0 a month plus usage
  • Kilo Pass StarterUSD 19 per month
  • Kilo Pass ProUSD 49 per month
Show 4 more plans
  • Kilo Pass ExpertUSD 199 per month
  • TeamsUSD 15 per user per month
  • EnterpriseCustom
  • Cloud computeUSD 0.33 to $1.20 per hourbilled per second
Plan conditions and sources

Warp

Prices confirmed · Oct 24, 2026
  • FreeUSD 0
  • BuildUSD 20 per monthor $18 per month billed annually
  • MaxUSD 200 per monthor $180 per month billed annually
  • BusinessUSD 50 per user per monthor $45 billed annually
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
Plan conditions and sources
Official pricing pages, captured from our server in Germany; regional prices or currency can differ
Kilo Code official pricing page screenshot with plan names
Kilo CodeOfficial pricing pagekilo.aiCaptured
Warp pricing page in annual view with Free at $0, Build at $18 a month and Max at $180 a month
WarpOfficial pricing pagewarp.devCaptured

Strengths and limits

Kilo Code

Strengths

  • Free open-source clients: The VS Code extension, JetBrains plugin and CLI are MIT-licensed and free to install, with no mandatory subscription for individuals.
  • Many ways to pay for models: Free models, local models, your own provider keys or Gateway credits at provider rates, so you can avoid Kilo inference spend entirely.
  • Several surfaces, one agent: The same agent is offered in VS Code, JetBrains, the terminal, the cloud and Slack, and cloud sessions can be resumed locally per the FAQ.

Limits to plan around

  • Total cost is not one number: Platform, model inference, a 5% processing fee on top-ups and cloud compute are billed as separate parts, so a monthly bill has to be assembled.
  • Cloud compute is extra even with your own keys: The pricing FAQ says bringing your own keys covers model inference, not the container that runs a cloud agent.
  • Paid credits expire: Paid credits, including automatic top-ups, expire one calendar year after purchase; the 5% processing fee is non-refundable.

Warp

Strengths

  • Free terminal: The terminal and Agent CLI need no subscription; ordinary shell commands never use agent usage.
  • Open source client: Warp's client source is public under AGPL v3, and the docs publish the full list of telemetry events.
  • Own key on Free: Individuals and companies of 10 or fewer employees can bring an OpenAI, Anthropic or Google key on every plan, including Free.

Limits to plan around

  • No bundled agent usage on Free: Free-plan purchases carry a premium: $12 buys $10 of usage.
  • Billing unit in transition: Self-serve accounts moved from credits to dollars, and the pricing page still mixes both.
  • Included usage expires monthly: Unused included usage does not roll over, even on annual plans.

See both products

The two products on their official sites
Kilo Code homepage screenshot showing the official landing page
Kilo CodeOfficial homepagekilo.aiCaptured
Warp homepage with the headline Open infrastructure for cloud software factories and a grid of agent runs
WarpOfficial homepagewarp.devCaptured
Product pages of both tools
Warp terminal page with the headline The terminal, rebuilt for the agent era and an install command box
WarpOfficial sitewarp.devCaptured

Start from your task, not from a winner.

Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.

How we review

Change this pair

Choose tools

Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.

Audio & voice

Automation

Coding

Data & spreadsheets

Images & design

Presentations

Research & sources

Video & editing

Website builders

Writing & content

Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.

Questions about comparing tools

How does the comparison work?

Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.

Do you declare a winner?

No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.

Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?

Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.

Can I compare more than two tools?

Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.

Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.