Lindy vs Make
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
Delegate a task with a defined handoff
Connect app modules in visual automation scenarios.
- Free access
- Lindy: Free trial only
- Make: Free access
- Paid from
- Lindy: USD 29.99 per user per month
- Make: No fixed price listed
- Plans listed
- Lindy: 4
- Make: 3
- Public API
- Lindy: Not confirmed
- Make: Yes
Where Lindy and Make differ
- AccessLindy offers a free trial only, while Make offers free access.
- CardLindy needs a card to start; Make does not.
- Pricing checkPrices confirmed for Lindy; pricing review due for Make.
- PlansLindy lists 4 plans and Make lists 3.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| Lindy | Fact | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free trial only | Free accessDiffers | Free access availableFree · USD 0 |
| USD 29.99 per user per monthPlus | Lowest listed paid plan | No fixed price listed |
| From USD 29.99 per user per month; limited new-Slack-teammate trial | Pricing model | Free + paid; quote varies |
| 4 | Plans listedDiffers | 3 |
| Not confirmed | Public API | Yes |
| Required | Card to startDiffers | Not required |
| No | Open sourceSame | No |
| What it is for | ||
| Teams drafting work from shared context | Built for | Visual automation for app workflows |
| Automation | CategorySame | Automation |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with | Not listed |
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Oct 1, 2026 | Pricing checkDiffers | Pricing review due · Sep 25, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
Lindy
Prices confirmed · Oct 1, 2026- PlusUSD 29.99 per user per month
- ProUSD 99.99 per user per month
- MaxUSD 199.99 per user per month
- EnterpriseCustom quote
Make
Pricing review due · Sep 25, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- Paid automationConfirm current quote
- EnterpriseCustom pricing
Strengths and limits
Lindy
Strengths
- Shared allocation: Seat allowances contribute to a pool that the workspace can distribute.
- Visible revisions: Files can be inspected and earlier saved versions restored.
- Approval choice in shared threads: Integration settings let a team gate writes in the documented Slack context.
Limits to plan around
- Seats can trigger billing: Direct signups and returning teammates are outside the new-Slack-user trial rule.
- Channel-specific guardrails: Do not carry a shared-thread approval assumption into private chat.
- Computer-use plan conflict: The public pricing wording and detailed Plus feature table need confirmation before a browser-control task.
Make
Strengths
- Visual scenario builder: Routers, filters and fallback routes are drawn as a diagram, so the path each record takes is visible before anything runs.
- Free plan with no time limit: Free does not expire, so a small scenario can keep running without a subscription as long as it stays within the Free limits.
- Countable billing unit: An ordinary non-AI module run normally uses one credit, so cost can be estimated by counting modules and bundles.
Limits to plan around
- Free scheduling floor: On Free, scheduled scenarios run at most every 15 minutes and only two scenarios can be active at once.
- Empty checks still count: A scheduled trigger uses an operation each time it looks for data, even when it finds nothing; budget for checks as well as records.
- Separate AI-provider charges: With an eligible custom AI-provider connection, the provider bills its tokens on top of the operation credits Make charges.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.