OpenMAIC vs Diagrimo
Plans, free access, limits and intended use side by side, taken from each vendor’s own pages. No score and no winner: the facts show where the two differ.
Change tools
Free code, but the models are your bill
Check the template license before client work
- Free access
- OpenMAIC: Free access
- Diagrimo: Free access
- Paid from
- OpenMAIC: No fixed price listed
- Diagrimo: USD 6.99 per month
- Plans listed
- OpenMAIC: 1
- Diagrimo: 3
- Public API
- OpenMAIC: Not confirmed
- Diagrimo: Not confirmed
Where OpenMAIC and Diagrimo differ
- Open sourceOnly OpenMAIC is open source.
- PlansOpenMAIC lists 1 plans and Diagrimo lists 3.
Head to head
Each value from the tool’s profile and the vendor’s own pages
| OpenMAIC | Fact | Diagrimo |
|---|---|---|
| Access and price | ||
| Free access availableFree (open source, MIT) · 0 | Free accessSame | Free access availableFree · USD 0 |
| No fixed price listed | Lowest listed paid plan | USD 6.99 per monthPlus Yearly · billed annually |
| Free MIT-licensed code; model and hosting costs are yours | Pricing model | Free daily credits; Plus from $6.99/month billed yearly |
| 1 | Plans listedDiffers | 3 |
| Not confirmed | Public API | Not confirmed |
| Not confirmed | Card to start | Not confirmed |
| Yes | Open sourceDiffers | No |
| What it is for | ||
| Turning a topic or document into an interactive AI-taught lesson | Built for | Turning notes and reports into diagrams inside one document |
| Presentations | CategorySame | Presentations |
| Platforms |
|
| Works with | Not listed |
| How current | ||
| Profile sources checked | ||
| Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026 | Pricing checkSame | Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026 |
Official source check for both tools. No hands-on testing and no score: “Differs” marks a documented difference, not a better tool.
Plans and prices
Diagrimo
Prices confirmed · Sep 29, 2026- FreeUSD 0
- Plus MonthlyUSD 9.99 per month after a 7-day $0 trial
- Plus YearlyUSD 6.99 per monthbilled annually
Strengths and limits
OpenMAIC
Strengths
- Permissive license: The MIT license allows commercial use free of charge, and the README says so directly.
- Bring your own models: Works with many cloud providers or local models, so data and cost stay under your control.
- Portable output: Editable .pptx, self-contained HTML and a classroom ZIP that can play offline after import.
Limits to plan around
- Not zero-cost in practice: Cloud models, image, video and voice providers bill you separately, and the project publishes no cost estimate per lesson.
- Open by default: Without an ACCESS_CODE, every route of a deployment, including the API, is reachable by anyone who finds it.
- Hosted terms are unclear: The demo sign-in runs through a Chinese-language MAIC account page, and hosted credit amounts are not published.
Diagrimo
Strengths
- Low paid entry: Plus is $9.99 a month, starting with 7 days at $0.
- Document and diagrams together: Text and visuals sit on one page that exports as a full PDF.
- Cost preview: Credit estimates appear before a new layout or style is applied.
Limits to plan around
- Free credit amount unstated: Current pages say Free credits reset daily without giving a number.
- Template license limits: Tenorshare terms restrict output built on its templates to non-commercial use without an extra license.
- No published team plan: The pricing page lists Plus only, with no seat or team pricing.
See both products
Start from your task, not from a winner.
Run both tools on the same real task, then compare the result, how much editing it needs and how fast it uses your plan’s allowance.
How we reviewChange this pair
Choose tools
Choose two tools below. You can replace either selection at any time.
Audio & voice
Automation
Coding
Data & spreadsheets
Images & design
Presentations
Research & sources
Video & editing
Website builders
Writing & content
Comparing tools from different categories is fine, and often useful — a writing assistant and a research tool solve different halves of the same job. The table will show you exactly where they diverge.
Questions about comparing tools
How does the comparison work?
Add two tools to the comparison tray from any tool card, then open this page. The table pulls each tool's verified plan details, platforms, strengths and limits from its profile, so both columns carry the same kind of evidence, with a separate source-check date for each tool.
Do you declare a winner?
No. The table sets two tools against each other on documented facts, not on a score. Which one wins depends on your task, your budget and your usage volume — three things we cannot see from here.
Why are some cells empty or marked unverified?
Because we could not confirm that detail on the vendor's own pages. Rather than filling the gap with a figure from elsewhere, we mark it and say why on the tool's profile.
Can I compare more than two tools?
Not at once. Two columns keep the differences readable and force a real decision. Remove either selected tool to replace it, or clear both to start a new pair.
Every figure in the table above comes from the linked profile, where the source and the verification date are listed. Browse all tools or read the editorial policy.